Revista de atención de la salud de la mujer
Acceso abierto

abstracto

Randomized Trial of HIFEM Pelvic Floor Stimulation Device Compared with Pelvic Floor Exercises for Treatment of Urinary Incontinence

Nathan Guerette1*, Stephanie Molden2, Manish Gopal3, Neeraj Kohli4

Objective: The pelvic floor muscles (PFM) are essential for structural support for the pelvic organs. Loss of PFM function can lead to urinary incontinence (UI), a common condition in parous women. This study investigated the efficacy of High-Intensity Focused Electromagnetic (HIFEM) compared to conventional pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) for the improvement of UI in women.

Methods: Thirty-eight women (27-66 years) underwent six treatments scheduled twice a week for three weeks with either a HIFEM procedure or a standardized pelvic floor exercise. Follow-up visits were performed at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after the final treatment session. Outcome measures included quality-of-life questionnaires (ICIQ-BD, UDI-6, ICIQ-LUTSqol), pad usage, therapy satisfaction, and therapy comfort.

Results: Analysis of ICIQ-LUTSqol at 6 months showed significant UI improvement in the HIFEM group (-15.2 points, 35%, p=4.4∙10-10) but not in the PFMT group (-5.1 points, 13%, p=1.8∙10-1). The HIFEM group maintained significant improvement over baseline at 12 months (24%, p=3.4∙10-2) while the PFMT group’s score regressed (3%, p=9.3∙10-1). ICIQ-BD demonstrated greater improvement in urgency symptoms in the HIFEM vs. PFMT group (32% vs. 5%) at 12 months. 86% of HIFEM subjects reported less leakage at 12 months compared to 71% of PFMT subjects. Pad usage decreased by -1.7/day in the HIFEM group vs. -1.0/day in the PFMT group.

Conclusion: The HIFEM procedure appears to be safe and effective for improving female continence and quality of life to 1-year.